Math 202: Abstract Algebras

This is the review post for Part \mathcal{A}: abstract algebras.

Throughout the Math 202 sequence and on the qualifying exam, the term “algebra” by default refers to a complex vector space \mathcal{A} of positive, finite dimension equipped with a unital, associative, bilinear multiplication \mathcal{A} \times \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{A} denoted (A,B) \mapsto AB and an antilinear, antimultiplicative, involution conjugation \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{A} denoted A \mapsto A^*.

The fundamental example is \mathcal{A}=\mathbb{C}. Two further examples are \mathbb{C}^n with coordinatewise multiplication and conjugation, and \mathbb{C}^{n \times n} with matrix multiplication and Hermitian conjugation. Both coincide with \mathbb{C} for n=1. Thus, we have an example of a commutative algebra of every dimension, and for algebras of square dimension bigger than one we also have a noncommutative example.

Inside a given algebra \mathcal{A} there are various classes of special elements. The broadest of these is the class of normal elements, which consists of those A \in \mathcal{A} which commute with their conjugate, A^*A=AA^*. Two subclasses thereof are selfadjoint elements which are equal to their conjugate, X^*=X, and unitary elements which satisfy U^*U=I. Normal elements which are both selfadjoint and unitary are called reflections and they satisfy R^2=I. Selfadjoint elements which can be factored as N=A^*A are called nonnegative, and selfadjoint elements such that P^2=P are called projections. Two projections which satisfy PQ=0 are said to be orthogonal.

Theorem A1. Every A \in \mathcal{A} can be written A=X+iY with X,Y selfadjoint. Furthermore, this decomposition is unique and A is normal if and only if X and Y commute.

Theorem A2. An algebra \mathcal{A} is commutative if and only if all its elements are normal.

Theorem A3. Any set of nonzero pairwise orthogonal projections in \mathcal{A} is linearly independent.

The category \mathbf{Alg} has algebras as objects. Morphisms are linear transformations \Phi \colon \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B} such that

\Phi(I_\mathcal{A}) = I_\mathcal{B},\ \Phi(AB)=\Phi(A)\Phi(B),\ \Phi(A^*)=\Phi(A)^*,

and these are called algebra homomorphisms. Two algebras \mathcal{A} and \mathcal{B} are said to be isomorphic if and only if there exists a bijective homomorphism between them.

Theorem A4. If \mathcal{A} is a one-dimensional algebra then there exists a unique isomorphism \mathcal{A} \to \mathbb{C}.

Theorem A5. If \mathcal{A} is a two-dimensional algebra then it is commutative.

Given any algebra homomorphism \Phi \colon \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}, the set

\mathrm{Im}(\Phi) = \{\Phi(A) \colon A \in \mathcal{A}\}

is a subspace of \mathcal{B} which contains I_\mathcal{B} and is closed under multiplication and conjugation, i.e. it is a subalgebra of \mathcal{B}. The set

\mathrm{Ker}(\Phi) =\{K \in \mathcal{A} \colon \Phi(K)=0_\mathcal{B}\}

is a subspace of \mathcal{A} which does not necessarily contain I_\mathcal{A}. However, \mathrm{Ker}(\Phi) is closed under multiplication and conjugation, and in fact for every K \in \mathrm{Ker}(\Phi) we have \{AK,KA\} \subset \mathrm{Ker}(\Phi) for all A \in \mathcal{A}, i.e. \mathrm{Ker}(\Phi) is an ideal in \mathcal{A}.

Like the collection of subspaces of a given vector space, we can partially order the set of subalgebras of a given algebra \mathcal{A} by set-theoretic inclusion. This poset has a unique minimal element given by \mathbb{C}I=\{\alpha I \colon \alpha \in \mathbb{C}\} and a unique maximal element of the poset of subalgebras of \mathcal{A} is \mathcal{A} itself. Given two subalgebras \mathcal{B} and \mathcal{C} of \mathcal{A}, there is a unique maximal subalgebra contained in both of them, namely \mathcal{B} \cap \mathcal{C}. There is also a unique minimal subalgebra containing both \mathcal{B} and \mathcal{C}, namely the intersection of all subalgebras containing \mathcal{B} \cap \mathcal{C}. This is called the algebra generated by \mathcal{B} \cup \mathcal{C} and it is denoted \mathrm{Alg}(\mathcal{B} \cup \mathcal{C}).

Theorem A6. We have \mathrm{Alg}(\mathcal{B} \cup \mathcal{C})=\mathrm{Span}\{A_1 \dots A_m \colon m \geq 0,\ A_i \in \mathcal{B} \cup \mathcal{C}\}.

In fact, for an arbitrary subset S \subseteq \mathcal{A} there is a unique minimal algebra \mathrm{Alg}(S) containing S, namely the intersection of all subalgebras containing it, and this is called the subalgebra generated by S.

Theorem A7. We have \mathrm{Alg}(S) = \mathrm{Span}\{A_1 \dots A_m \colon m \geq 0,\ A_i \in S \cup S^*\}, where S^*=\{A^* \colon A \in S\}.

An important subalgebra of a given algebra \mathcal{A} is its center,

Z(\mathcal{A)}=\{Z \in \mathcal{A} \colon ZA=AZ \text{ for all }A \in \mathcal{A}\}.

We have Z(\mathcal{A})=\mathcal{A} if and only if \mathcal{A} is commutative, and \dim Z(\mathcal{A}) can be viewed as a measure of how (non)commutative \mathcal{A} is.

In fact, subalgebras always come in pairs: given \mathcal{B} \leq \mathcal{A} the corresponding centralizer is

Z(\mathcal{B},\mathcal{A})=\{A \in \mathcal{A} \colon AB=BA \text{ for all }B \in \mathcal{B}\}.

Theorem A8. If \mathcal{B} and \mathcal{C} are subalgebras of \mathcal{A} such that \mathcal{C} \subseteq \mathcal{B}, then their centralizers are subalgebras such that Z(\mathcal{B},\mathcal{A}) \subseteq Z(\mathcal{C},\mathcal{A}).

One may also consider the set of commutative subalgebras of a given algebra \mathcal{A} ordered by inclusion. The intersection of any family of commutative subalgebras is again a commutative subalgebra. However, for an arbitrary set X \subset \mathcal{A} there may not exist a commutative subalgebra containing it; this occurs for example if X=\{A\} consists of a single non-normal element.

Theorem A9. A set X \subseteq \mathcal{A} is contained in a commutative subalgebra of \mathcal{A} if and only if \mathrm{Alg}(X) is commutative.

The unique minimal element of the poset of commutative subalgebras of \mathcal{A} is still \mathbb{C}I, but there may be many maximal commutative subalgebras \mathcal{B} \subseteq \mathcal{A} having the property that they are not contained in any strictly larger commutative subalgebra.

Theorem A10. A commutative subalgebra \mathcal{B} \subseteq \mathcal{A} is a maximal commutative subalgebra if and only if Z(\mathcal{B},\mathcal{A})=\mathcal{B}.

A natural question is whether we can define a scalar product on a given algebra \mathcal{A} which is compatible with its multiplication and conjugation. Given any scalar product on \mathcal{A}, we can normalize it so that \langle I,I \rangle =1. A scalar product so normalized is said to have the left-Frobenius property if

\langle AB,C\rangle = \langle B,A^*C\rangle \quad\text{for all }A,B,C \in \mathcal{A}.

We say that it has the right-Frobenius property if

\langle AB,C\rangle = \langle A,CB^*\rangle \quad\text{for all }A,B,C \in \mathcal{A}.

A scalar product satisfying \langle I,I\rangle=1 which has both the left-Frobenius property and the right-Frobenius property is called a Frobenius scalar product.

The existence of Frobenius scalar products on \mathcal{A} is intimately related to the existence of special linear functionals on \mathcal{A}. The reason for this is that given any linear functional \varphi \colon \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{C} we can define a corresponding Hermitian form on \mathcal{A} by

\langle A,B \rangle_\varphi := \varphi(A^*B),

and this form has the left-Frobenius property.

A faithful state is a linear functional \sigma \colon \mathcal{A} to \mathbb{C} satisfying \sigma(I)=1 and \sigma(A^*A) \geq 0 with equality if and only if A=0_\mathcal{A}.

Theorem A.10. Faithful states on \mathcal{A} are in bijection with left-Frobenius scalar products on \mathcal{A}.

A trace is a linear functional \tau \colon \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{C} which satisfies \tau(AB)=\tau(BA).

Theorem A.11. Faithful tracial states on \mathcal{A} are in bijection with Frobenius scalar products on \mathcal{A}.

An algebra \mathcal{A} equipped with a Frobenius scalar product is called a von Neumann algebra. Equivalently, a von Neumann algebra is an algebra \mathcal{A} together with a faithful tracial state.

1 Comment

Leave a Reply