Math 202B: Lecture 16

***Problems in this lecture due February 21***

In this lecture we will review the concrete algebras considered so far.

Function algebras. The archetypal commutative algebras: \mathcal{F}(X) of functions on a finite set X with all operations defined pointwise. We understand function algebras completely.

The elementary functions \{E_x \colon x \in X\} are a basis of \mathcal{F}(X) consisting of pairwise orthogonal selfadjoint idempotents: E_x^*=E_x and E_xE_y = \delta_{xy}E_x. In fact, this feature characterizes function algebras up to isomorphism.

Theorem: An algebra \mathcal{A} is isomorphic to a function algebra if and only if it has a basis of pairwise orthogonal selfadjoint idempotents.

We have obtained a complete classification of subalgebras of function algebras.

Theorem: Subalgebras of \mathcal{F}(X) are in bijection with partitions of X. The correspondence is given explicitly by

\mathcal{A}(\mathfrak{p})=\{A \in \mathcal{F}(X) \colon A \text{ constant on the blocks of }\mathfrak{p}\}.

Corollary: Every subalgebra of a function algebra is isomorphic to a function algebra.

We have a complete understanding of ideals in function algebras.

Theorem: Ideals in \mathcal{F}(X) are in bijection with subsets of \mathcal{X}. The correspondence is given explicitly by

\mathcal{J}(S) = \{A \in \mathcal{F}(X) \colon A \text{ vanishes on }S\}.

We have a complete understanding of states on function algebras.

Theorem: States on \mathcal{F}(X) are in bijection with probability functions on X. The correspondence is given explicitly by

\tau_P(A) = \sum\limits_{x \in X} A(x)P(x).

Corollary: Faithful states on \mathcal{F}(X) are in bijection with nonvanishing probability functions on X.

Corollary: Homomorphisms \mathcal{F}(X) \to \mathbb{C} are in bijection with points of X. The correspondence is given explicitly by

\varphi_x(A)=A(x), \quad A \in \mathcal{F}(X).

Endomorphism algebras. The archetypal noncommutative algebras: \mathrm{End}(V) is the algebra of linear operators on a finite-dimensional Hilbert space V.

If X \subset V is an orthonormal basis, a vector space basis of \mathrm{End}(V) is given by the elementary operators

E_{yx}v=y\langle x,v\rangle, \quad x,y \in X,\ v \in V.

The relations governing the elementary operators are

E_{yx}^*=E_{xy} \quad\text{and}\quad E_{zy}E_{xw} = \langle y,x\rangle E_{zw}.

In particular, \{E_{xx} \colon x \in X\} spans a subalgebra \mathcal{D}(X) isomorphic to \mathcal{F}(X).

Theorem: Every MASA in \mathrm{End}(V) is of the form \mathcal{D}(X) for some orthonormal basis X \subset V.

Corollary: All abelian subalgebras of \mathrm{End}(V) have dimension at most \dim V.

Our understand of abelian subalgebras of \mathrm{End}(V) is the following.

Theorem: Every abelian subalgebra of \mathrm{End}(V) is isomorphic to a subalgebra of \mathcal{F}(X) for some orthonormal basis X \subset V. In particular, all abelian subalgebras of \mathrm{End}(V) are isomorphic to function algebras.

At present, this is all we know about subalgebras of \mathrm{End}(V). A major reason for wanting to know more is the following.

Theorem: Every von Neumann algebra (\mathcal{A},\tau) is isomorphic to a subalgebra of \mathrm{End}(V) for some Hilbert space V.

On the bright side, our understanding of states and traces on \mathrm{End}(V). Let X \subset V be an orthonormal basis and define a corresponding linear functional on \mathrm{End}(V) by

\mathrm{Tr}(A) = \sum\limits_{x \in X} \langle x,Ax \rangle.

Theorem: All traces on \mathrm{End}(V) are scalar multiples of \mathrm{Tr}.

Corollary: If \dim V>1, there are no algebra homomorphisms \mathrm{End}(V) \to \mathbb{C}.

An operator P \in \mathrm{End}(V) is called nonnegative if P=Q^*Q for some Q \in \mathrm{End}(V). A nonnegative operator such that \mathrm{Tr}(P)=1 is called a density operator.

Theorem: States on \mathrm{End}(V) are in bijection with density operators. The correspondence is given explicitly by \tau_P(A)=\mathrm{Tr}(AP).

Convolution algebras. The convolution algebra \mathcal{C}(G) of a finite group G coincides with the function algebra \mathcal{F}(G) as a vector space, but conjugation and multiplication are instead defined by

E_g^*=E_{g^{-1}} \quad\text{and}\quad E_gE_h=E_{gh}, \quad g,h \in G.

In particular, \{E_g \colon g \in G\} is a basis of \mathcal{C}(G) consisting of unitary elements rather than orthogonal idempotents.

Our understanding of convolution algebras is quite basic at present. For example, we know how to associate a subalgebra \mathcal{C}(H) of \mathcal{C}(G) to a subgroup H \leq G, but we do not know much else about subalgebras of \mathcal{C}(G).

We did however manage to classify states and traces on \mathcal{C}(G). A function P \in \mathcal{C}(G) is called nonnegative if for any finite choice \alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n \in \mathbb{C} and g_1,\dots,g_n \in G we have

\sum\limits_{i,j=1}^n \overline{\alpha_i}\alpha_jP(g_i^{-1}g_j) \geq 0.

Theorem: States on \mathcal{C}(G) are in bijection with nonnegative functions in \mathcal{C}(G). The correspondence is given explicitly by

\tau_P(A) =\sum\limits_{g \in G}A(g)P(g),

and \tau_P is a trace if and only if P is a central function.

The only function P \colon G \to \mathcal{C} which is both a probability function and a nonnegative function in the above sense is E_e, and it is also a class function. Furthermore, the corresponding tracial state

\tau_{E_e}(A) =A(e)

is faithful. Therefore, (\mathcal{C}(G),\tau_{E_e}) is a von Neumann algebra and we can conclude the following.

Theorem: The convolution algebras \mathcal{C}(G) is isomorphic to a subalgebra of \mathrm{End}(V) for some Hilbert space V. Furthermore, if G is abelian then \mathcal{C}(G) is isomorphic to a function algebra.

We also have a classification of homomorphisms from \mathcal{C}(G) to \mathbb{C}.

Theorem: A state \tau_P on \mathcal{C}(G) is an algebra homomorphism if and only if P \in \mathcal{C}(G) is a group homomorphism from G to the unit circle \mathbb{U} \subset \mathbb{C}.

Problem 16.1. Show that there exists at least one algebra homomorphism \mathcal{C}(G) \to \mathbb{C}. Given an example of a group for which this minimum is achieved.

Class algebras. The center of \mathcal{C}(G) is denoted \mathcal{K}(G) and it consists precisely of functions constant on conjugacy classes of G. Therefore, we call \mathcal{K}(G) the class algebra of G. Writing \{C_\alpha \colon \alpha \in \Lambda\} for the set of conjugacy classes in G, the functions

K_\alpha =\sum\limits_{g \in C_\alpha} E_g, \quad \alpha \in \Lambda,

form a basis of \mathcal{K}(G). This basis is orthogonal in the L^2-scalar product,

\langle K_\alpha,K_\beta \rangle = \delta_{\alpha\beta}|K_\alpha|.

Problem 16.2. Show that \tau_{E_e}(K_\alpha K_\beta) is equal to the number of solutions to the equation xy=e in G such that x \in C_\alpha and y \in C_\beta.

Four Functors. One way to organize the subject matter so far is to consider that we have defined four functors.

The functor X \rightsquigarrow \mathcal{F}(X) takes us from the category of finite sets to the category of commutative algebras.

The functor X \rightsquigarrow \mathcal{E}(X)=\mathrm{End}\mathcal{F}(X) takes us from the category of finite sets to the category of algebras.

The functor G \rightsquigarrow \mathcal{C}(G) takes us from the category of finite groups to the category of algebras.

The functor G \rightsquigarrow \mathcal{K}(G) takes us from the category of finite groups the the category of commutative algebras.

Leave a Reply